what country is the biggest threat to world peace

February 2020

�US IS GREATEST THREAT TO WORLD PEACE�

This is notably in the Middle East, where overwhelming majorities regard the US and its shut ally Israel as the major threats they face.

By Jamshed Baruah

NEW YORK (IDN) � American philosopher and political activist Noam Chomsky has criticized Washington'southward policies on Islamic republic of iran and referred to polls from prestigious centres, which show that America is the biggest threat to globe peace. According to Islamic republic of iran Printing/America, he told a New York school on January 4 that the former Republican Party had at present go a "radical rogue" that has abased whatsoever parliamentary policy.

"They may succeed in raising sanctions and fifty-fifty secondary sanctions on other countries, and may have other measures to keep Islamic republic of iran out of agreement with the United States," Chomsky added.

Amongst the polls he was referring to was the WIN/Gallup International poll back in 2013. �Which country do y'all call back is the greatest threat to peace in the world today?� This was one question asked. The BBC reported that the United States was the champion by a substantial margin, winning 3 times the votes of second-place Pakistan.

Past contrast, the debate in American scholarly and media circles is about whether Iran can be independent, and whether the huge NSA surveillance organization is needed to protect United states of america security, wrote Chomsky.

Beneath are extensive excerpts from his articleIn These Times on February 5, 2014, with the championship �The Greatest Threat to Globe Peace� � which is relevant near six years later, with the difference that President Donald Trump has contributed his sizable share to farther eroding the U.s.a. popularity.Chomsky wrote:

In view of the poll, it would seem that there are more than pertinent questions: Can the United States be contained and other nations secured in the confront of the US threat?

In some parts of the world the United States ranks even college as a perceived menace to world peace, notably in the Centre East, where overwhelming majorities regard the US and its shut marry State of israel as the major threats they face up, non the US-Israeli favourite: Iran.

Few Latin Americans are likely to question the judgment of Cuban nationalist hero Jos� Mart�, who wrote in 1894, �The further they depict away from the United States, the freer and more prosperous the [Latin] American people will be.�

Mart�'s judgment has been confirmed in recent years, once over again by an assay of poverty by the UN Economical Committee for Latin America and the Caribbean, released last month (January 2014).

The Un study shows that far-reaching reforms have sharply reduced poverty in Brazil, Uruguay, Venezuela and some other countries where US influence is slight, but that it remains bottomless in others � namely, those that take long been under US domination, like Guatemala and Republic of honduras. Even in relatively wealthy Mexico, under the umbrella of the North American Costless Trade Agreement, poverty is astringent, with ane million added to the numbers of the poor in 2013.

Sometimes the reasons for the world'due south concerns are obliquely recognized in the United States, as when one-time CIA director Michael Hayden, discussing Obama's drone murder entrada, conceded that �Correct at present, there isn't a government on the planet that agrees with our legal rationale for these operations, except for Afghanistan and peradventure Israel.�

A normal country would be concerned by how it is viewed in the world. Certainly that would be true of a country committed to �a decent respect to the opinions of mankind,� to quote the Founding Fathers. Just the U.s. is far from a normal country. It has had the most powerful economic system in the earth for a century, and has had no real claiming to its global hegemony since World War II, despite some turn down, partly cocky-administered.

The U.s., witting of �soft power,� undertakes major campaigns of �public diplomacy� (aka propaganda) to create a favourable epitome, sometimes accompanied past worthwhile policies that are welcomed. But when the world persists in believing that the United States is by far the greatest threat to peace, the American press scarcely reports the fact.

The ability to ignore unwanted facts is one of the prerogatives of unchallenged power. Closely related is the correct to radically revise history.

A electric current example can exist seen in the laments about the escalating Sunni-Shiite conflict that is vehement autonomously the Middle East, peculiarly in Iraq and Syrian arab republic. The prevailing theme of US commentary is that this strife is a terrible consequence of the withdrawal of American forcefulness from the region � a lesson in the dangers of �isolationism.�

The opposite is more well-nigh correct. The roots of the conflict within Islam are many and varied, but it cannot be seriously denied that the dissever was significantly exacerbated by the American- and British-led invasion of Republic of iraq. And information technology cannot be too oft repeated that aggression was defined at the Nuremberg Trials as �the supreme international crime,� differing from others in that it encompasses all the evil that follows, including the current ending.

A remarkable illustration of this rapid inversion of history is the American reaction to the current atrocities in Fallujah. The dominant theme is the pain nearly the sacrifices, in vain, of the American soldiers who fought and died to liberate Fallujah. A look at the news reports of the US assaults on Fallujah in 2004 apace reveals that these were amidst the most vicious and disgraceful war crimes of the aggression.

The death of Nelson Mandela provides another occasion for reflection on the remarkable impact of what has been called �historical technology�: reshaping the facts of history to serve the needs of power.

When Mandela at last obtained his liberty, he declared that �During all my years in prison, Republic of cuba was an inspiration and Fidel Castro a tower of force. � [Cuban victories] destroyed the myth of the invincibility of the white oppressor [and] inspired the fighting masses of South Africa �.a turning indicate for the liberation of our continent�and of my people�from the scourge of apartheid. � What other country can indicate to a record of greater selflessness than Cuba has displayed in its relations to Africa?�

Today the names of Cubans who died defending Angola from US-backed South African aggression, defying American demands that they leave the land, are inscribed on the �Wall of Names� in Pretoria'due south Liberty Park. And the thousands of Cuban help workers who sustained Republic of angola, largely at Cuban expense, are also not forgotten.

The US-approved version is quite different. From the starting time days later South Africa agreed to withdraw from illegally occupied Namibia in 1988, paving the way for the cease of apartheid, the consequence was hailed by the Wall Street Journal as a �splendid achievement� of American diplomacy, �one of the most significant foreign policy achievements of the Reagan administration.�

The reasons why Mandela and South Africans perceive a radically different picture are spelled out in Piero Gleijeses' masterful scholarly inquiryVisions of Freedom: Havana, Washington, Pretoria, and the Struggle for Southern Africa, 1976-1991.

As Gleijeses assuredly demonstrates, Southward Africa's aggression and terrorism in Republic of angola and its occupation of Namibia were ended by �Cuban military machine might� accompanied by �fierce black resistance� inside South Africa and the backbone of Namibian guerrillas. The Namibian liberation forces easily won fair elections as soon every bit these were possible. Similarly, in elections in Angola, the Cuban-backed government prevailed � while the United states continued to support savage opposition terrorists there even after South Africa was compelled to back away.

To the end, the Reaganites remained virtually alone in their strong support for the apartheid regime and its murderous depredations in neighboring countries. Though these shameful episodes may exist wiped out of internal US history, others are likely to understand Mandela'south words.

In these and all too many other cases, supreme ability does provide protection against reality � to a point. � 3rd World Network Features.

-ends-

The above article is reproduced from IDN-InDepthNews, six January 2020.

When reproducing this feature, delight credit 3rd World Network Features and (if applicable) the cooperating mag or agency involved in the article, and requite the byline. Please send u.s.a. cuttings. And if reproduced on the internet, delight send the web link where the article appears to twn@twnetwork.org.

4897/20


BACK TO Chief  |  ONLINE BOOKSTORE  |  HOW TO ORDER

yirawalaspive2001.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.twn.my/twnf/2020/4897.htm

0 Response to "what country is the biggest threat to world peace"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel